|
|
Everyone I know resents Ticketmaster and their convenience fees. Now my resentment has blossomed into hatred because Ticketmaster has added price fixing to their convenience fees. Go on ticketmaster.com and try to buy a ticket for a popular concert. You will be told that there are no seats available but you will be guided to TicketsNow. Tickets on TicketsNow cost three, four, five, ten times the face value of the ticket. I thought ticket scalping was illegal, but it’s only scalping if you are just a dude selling tickets outside Madison Square Garden before a Knicks or Rangers game. If you are a ticket reseller like TicketsNow, you can charge whatever you want for a ticket. Ticket resellers get their hands on a bulk of tickets as fast as they can for popular shows. Since TicketsNow is a subsidiary of Ticketmaster, how fast do you think TicketsNow can get their hands on a stack of tickets. If you guessed instantaneously, you are correct. Tickets with bloated price tages are available on TicketsNow one minute after the show goes on sale. New York local channel 7 ran a piece about ire over Bruce Springsteen tickets. When confronted, Ticketmaster said it was a small glitch that only affect a few customers. Liars! It’s not just Springsteen, G and I tried to get Leonard Cohen tickets when they went on sale, but TicketsNow beat us to the punch. Surprise. Ticketmaster’s next move is to merge with the concert promoter Live Nation. The combined company will be able to set ticket prices even higher.
 NBC is guilty of blatant hypocrisy in banning PETA’s Superbowl ad because the ad is “too sexually suggestive,” they say. In the midst of a bunch of the Superbowl’s sexually charged ads, the PETA ad showing a bikini-clad woman fondling vegetables would have have blended right in With PETA’s over-the-top reputation, you might think a PETA ad would show bloody, abused animals to make their point. NBC’s ban might have been justified in that case. But the PETA ad’s message is Vegetarians Have Better Sex. Subversive concept, right? It’s not only the concept NBC doesn’t like, it’s the organization. Superbowl ads are all about sex, beer, cars, soft drinks and cute animals. I just watched a trailer for the movie Fast & Furious that flashed a frame of two women kissing. Watch closely at about 28 seconds in. In the Doritios commericial, a woman’s clothes are ripped off by the power of a man biting into a chip. Go Daddy ads are also blatantly sexual with three frat boys watching a woman shower over and over. Sexually suggestive is not a deal breaker for these advertisers. The PETA ad should have been able to run, just as the catholic vote pro-life ad should have been able to run. NBC should not pick and choose among potential advertisers, especially in these lean times, which would be a little leaner if there were more vegetarians. If NBC continues to discriminate, they should discriminate against the advertisers who use chimpanzees in their ads. The animal cruelty is not apparent–the chimps look so cute and happy. But chimps in show business are babies taken away from their mothers. They are abandoned or sold when they are too big and strong to perform any longer.
Happy Chinese New Year! I believe in making New Year’s resolutions, as long as they are manageable and measurable. I am still proud of saving the money to buy my first car with my first New Year’s resolution ever. I resolved to save $15 in tips per waitress shift. I had never saved a dime prior and I had the car by May. Since that long-ago year, I have kept some resolutions and abandoned others. This year, I made a resolution to exercise. Yes, you can laugh. Exercising, that final step to getting to my ideal weight, is a resolution broken as quickly as it is made. I only vaguely thought about how I would execute my resolution. Now it is January 26th and I have barely moved. Today, I admitted I am failing to keep my 2009 resolution. But then I remembered: today is the Chinese New Year. All is not lost. Do over.
Unlike 1.9 million people who spent Inauguration Day shoulder-to-shoulder on The Mall in Washington, I spent Inauguration Day shoulder-to-shoulder in a jury room. The members of today’s jury pool watched Barack Obama’s swearing-in on a small snowy television. When Obama finished taking the oath of office, the room burst into applause. Here we were, already doing our civic duty, listening to Barack Obama urge Americans to take responsibility. Were these folks surrounding me the same sleepy-eyed slackers who entered the bullpen three hours earlier? As I arrived, I looked around the room at the 140 adults gathered by random selection. Were these really my peers? This is my fifth time on jury duty and the routine never changes. A large contingent lines up to give their excuses. Confident and superior, they don’t comprehend that serving is compulsory. The clerk announces the rules; very few excuses will work. The clerk is always a man of a certain temperament, always sixty or older. He explains the rules in detail, knowing the questions the jury pool will ask in advance; he is patient, humorous, but not someone you mess with either. How does each county find this exact same guy? I admire the clerk’s even tone dealing with 140 adults who can’t follow rules as basic as the rules they followed in grade school. Two Upper East Side pre-crones behind me talk over the clerk’s spiel. Could they have possibly just met each other this morning? A few people use their cell phones despite the warnings. They talk loudly about budgets, deadlines and other urgent matters to establish their importance. Some, like me, just burrow in a book and wait.
An angry four-year-old shoots his babysitter. Take me back to the good old days when gun incidents involved a naughty kid playing with a gun and firing it accidentally. Now, children–babies– shoot with intent. This four-year-old kid, barely out of toddlerhood, got angry because the babysitter stepped on his foot. He ran to the closet, got the gun and shot the babysitter. Premeditated. Knew where the gun was. Somehow occured to him shooting would be an appropriate response. Where would he get that idea, parents? Just three days ago, I posted scary headlines regarding children and guns. The clustering of these incidents point to a trend rather than a tragic incident. Parents must be held responsible. If you need further proof that it is the parents, check out this story about a ten-month-old receiving a gun license. Laws must change.
|